Evaluation Criteria

PURPOSE

The priority of the organization embraces a social problem (orvarious problems), and can be linked to one or more of the SDG's. 

INNOVATION

The organization has an innovative approach for creating social impact and can easily prove this.

RESULTS

The organization can clearly identify the impact, measure it and show a proventrack record of results.

GOVERNANCE

There is a clear direction / vision of the organization to solve a social problem. The social goal is clearly lived through and identifiable within the organization.

LOCATION

The social enterprise's HQ is located in Belgium. The impact can be generated in Belgium or abroad.

Evaluation Committee

Belgium Impact counts on an evaluation committee from a broad set of sectors, backgrounds and experiences. This way, the platform can look from multiple facets into the activities of a social enterprise.

Eglantine Eeckhout

Martine Hendrickx

Karen Hiergens

Prof. Dr. Luc Van Liedekerke

Prof. Dr. Sybille Mertens

Sébastien Pereau

Evaluation process

After a first submission round, all jury members evaluate the cases and come back with a preliminary answer. Based on this, the entrepreneur may receive a go/no-go/still discussing message within 4 weeks' time. 
If the case is still to be discussed, the second round of discussion within the evaluation committee will take place, and the entrepreneur might be invited to submit more information to help guide the decision-making process.